<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1007/bf02105323
In the authors' words, ``the mathematical approach to general relativity insists that all coordinate systems are equal''. In contradiction to this ``doctrine'' the authors claim that, for some problems in general relativity, restriction to a subclass of coordinates is not only convenient to simplify calculations but even necessary to understand the physics of the situation at hand. This claim is illustrated by the Newtonian limit of general relativity, by the gauge issue in cosmology, and by certain aspects of numerical relativity. The paper is non-technical in the sense that it contains not a single formula.
Applications of differential geometry to physics, General relativity, general covariance, numerical relativity, Newtonian limit, cosmology, Relativistic cosmology
Applications of differential geometry to physics, General relativity, general covariance, numerical relativity, Newtonian limit, cosmology, Relativistic cosmology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |