Despite extensive research, there is still uncertainty on the separate effects of parity and age at first birth on breast cancer risk. Thus, information on these variables from formal epidemiological articles published in English since 1970 is reviewed in the present article. Among 26 studies considered, one found no significant association with either variable, seven showed an association between age at first birth but not parity and breast cancer risk, six an association with parity but not age at first birth, and in twelve studies both variables appeared to be independently related with breast cancer risk. Various reasons for these apparent differences can be considered, including heterogeneity between various populations (for instance, the proportion of multiparous women in studies showing no association with parity tended to be higher than in studies finding an inverse relation with parity), criteria for selection of cases and controls, influence of age and other covariates (among which the interval between pregnancies is of particular interest) and, of course, the role of chance. The data reviewed suggest, from an aetiological viewpoint, that both parity and age at first birth have some independent effect on breast carcinogenesis. From a public health viewpoint, however, it appears that the importance of age at first birth is greater, since the trend is linear across subsequent age levels, while the protection of parity seems to be quantitatively relevant only for women with four or five births or more.