
doi: 10.1007/bf02096335
pmid: 1105472
Four healthy firemen worked on the bicycle ergometer during four steps: (1) without a mask; (2) with a mean mask pressure equal to atmospheric pressure; (3) with a slight positive mean pressure of + 3.1 cm H2O inside the mask; (4) with a higher positive mean pressure of + 6.3 cm H2O inside the mask and a minimal mask pressure of + 2.2 cm H2O. Intraesophageal mean pressure increased only half as much as mask pressure. Only a slight tachycardia and a slight arterial hypotension was seen in step 4 compared to the control steps. Accordingly, a moderate increase of the preejection period (PEP) and a decrease of the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) was recorded, leading to a rise of the PEP/LVET ratio (left ventricular dysfunction). In contrast, no trace of arterial hypoxemia was seen. Opening of closed airways may explain this unexpected result.
Adult, Male, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Protective Devices, Respiration, Hemodynamics, Humans, Respiratory Protective Devices, Fires
Adult, Male, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Protective Devices, Respiration, Hemodynamics, Humans, Respiratory Protective Devices, Fires
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
