
doi: 10.1007/bf02087420
pmid: 8149842
This study examined the effects of changes in body position on different swallowing parameters derived from manofluorographic examinations. Quantitative data were obtained in a group of 12 young healthy volunteers. They were all tested in the upright position; six of them were also evaluated in the supine position, and the other six in the upside down position. In the different positions all volunteers were able to swallow a liquid bolus without aspiration or stasis. However, the dynamics of the swallow became different. Lying down resulted in a pharyngeal transit time comparable with the upright position. The tongue driving force was higher and the hypopharyngeal suction power weakened. In the upside down position, the pharyngeal transit time became longer and the tongue driving force was even more powerful. There was no apparent difference in the traditional manometric parameters; the amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity of the pharyngeal contraction on swallowing did not change obviously in the different body positions.
Adult, Male, Tongue, Manometry, Fluoroscopy, Posture, Pharyngeal Muscles, Humans, Female, Barium Sulfate, Deglutition
Adult, Male, Tongue, Manometry, Fluoroscopy, Posture, Pharyngeal Muscles, Humans, Female, Barium Sulfate, Deglutition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
