
doi: 10.1007/bf02067061
pmid: 1280890
AbstractSurgical resection remains the therapy of choice for the treatment of potentially curable gastrointestinal tract (GI) malignancies. Many of these tumors are incurable at the time of diagnosis and therapy should be directed towards palliation with the intent of minimizing pain, bleeding, obstruction, and potential morbidity. Endoscopic laser therapy is uniquely applicable for the palliation of GI tumors and in selective instances may be appropriate for the treatment of early lesions. Eighty‐six patients with GI malignancy have been treated at our institution since 1985. Thirty‐one patients had advanced upper GI lesions (esophagus: 26, gastric: 3, duodenal: 1, and pancreatic: 1) and 55 patients had lower GI tumors (colon: 37 and rectal: 18). Pre‐resectional recanalization for obstructing colorectal carcinomas obviating initial operative diversion was performed in 31 (56%) of 55 patients. Twenty‐four patients had palliative laser therapy (obstruction: 17 and hemorrhage: 7) with resolution of their symptoms. There was 1 laser related perforation in the pre‐resectional group and the overall complication rate was 1.2%. Endoscopic Nd:YAG and currently photodynamic laser therapy for GI tumors has proven to be an effective mode of therapy for advanced GI neoplasms with minimal morbidity. The utility of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of early stage esophageal and gastric cancers remains controversial.
Adult, Male, Laser Coagulation, Esophageal Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Adult, Male, Laser Coagulation, Esophageal Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
