
doi: 10.1007/bf02055693
pmid: 9102252
Stoma creation often involves a separate laparotomy incision. Recently, laparoscopy was suggested to minimize the morbidity associated with conventional open stomal techniques. We describe and evaluate a technique of stoma creation done directly through the stoma site, avoiding both laparotomy and laparoscopy.Charts of 36 patients who underwent attempted stoma creation using this closed technique were retrospectively reviewed.A total of 32 patients had stomas successfully created in this fashion (closed group); although four patients failed and required laparotomy (open group), there was an overall success rate of 89 percent. Blood loss (17 +/- 5 vs. 350 +/- 130 ml; P < .001), operative time (52 +/- 8 vs. 169 +/- 35 minutes; P < 0.001), and complications (3/32 vs. 4/4; P < 0.001) favored the closed group. No factors, including diagnosis, obesity, or previous abdominal surgery were identified that contraindicated use of the closed technique.Stomas can be safely made in a high proportion of patients without the need for laparotomy or laparoscopy. Failure of the closed technique identifies a group of patients who have a high associated operative time, blood loss, and morbidity when laparotomy is used for stoma creation and in whom laparoscopic procedures may improve results.
Adult, Male, Laparotomy, Ileostomy, Colostomy, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Laparotomy, Ileostomy, Colostomy, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
