Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Artificial anal sphincter

Authors: W D, Wong; L L, Jensen; D C, Bartolo; D A, Rothenberger;

Artificial anal sphincter

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the use of a fully implanted artificial anal sphincter for management of severe fecal incontinence.An artificial anal sphincter was implanted in 12 patients who failed conventional management for severe fecal incontinence. Careful patient follow-up was recorded during a mean 58-month follow-up. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative manometric assessment. Functional and patient satisfaction evaluations were obtained by mailed questionnaire.Three infections and three mechanical complications occurred in four patients (33 percent). A successful outcome was achieved in nine patients (75 percent). Postoperative manometric studies documented establishment of an elevated high-pressure zone compared with preoperative resting pressures. Seven patients returned a detailed functional assessment and patient satisfaction questionnaire at a mean of 40 months postsphincter activation. All seven patients reported continence to solid stool. Two patients had some problems with control of liquid stool, and three had occasional incontinence to flatus. Six of the seven patients rated their bowel control as good to excellent. All seven respondents were satisfied with their functional improvement.Early experience with an artificial anal sphincter has demonstrated that continence can be restored with acceptable morbidity in patients with severe fecal incontinence.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Postoperative Care, Adolescent, Manometry, Anal Canal, Prostheses and Implants, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Female, Fecal Incontinence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    172
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
172
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!