Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Initial registry results
Authors: L E, Smith; S T, Ko; T, Saclarides; P, Caushaj; B A, Orkin; K S, Khanduja;

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was first used on a regular basis in the United States in 1990. Because there is a sole source of instrumentation, the surgeons who use this equipment are known to us. Thus, this earliest registry is a compilation of data based on most patients who underwent TEM in the United States from 1990 to 1994.One hundred fifty-three cases were voluntarily registered by six surgeons. Pathology included 54 carcinomas, 82 adenomas, and 17 other entities. Most resections were full thickness. Fifty percent of cases were out of reach of standard instruments. Complication rate, hospital stay, and blood loss were recorded. Technical difficulties at time of surgery (9 percent), early complications (15 percent), and late complications (5 percent) have been tabulated.Recurrence rates for carcinoma were 10 percent for T1, 40 percent for T2, and 66 percent for T3 stages. Failures were treated by abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Adenomas recurred in 11 percent, but these recurrences were small and easily treatable.TEM has a low complication rate. By carefully selecting small, superficial cancers and adenomas, TEM results in superior outcome over other approaches to the mid and upper rectum.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adenoma, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Microsurgery, Carcinoma, Endoscopy, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Anus Neoplasms, Proctoscopy, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Registries, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    100
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
100
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!