
doi: 10.1007/bf02050033
pmid: 4584078
Procedures for testing drug sensitivity ofNocardia were standardized. Five strains each ofN. asteroides (NA) andN. brasiliensis (NB) isolated from pathogenic materials were tested for drug sensitivity in Sabouraud's glucose agar (SGA), Sabouraud's glucose broth (SGB) and SGB with addition of 10 % horse serum against sulphadiazine (S), penicillin (P), streptomycin (St), chloramphenicol (C), tetracycline (T) and 4-4-diamino diphenyl sulphone (DDS). The viability of strains at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of different drugs were also tested. Results showed that liquid medium is preferable to solid medium for drug testing as pellicle formation observed on the surface of liquid medium helps in accurate assessment of MIC. Serum addition did not appear to be necessary. Ten days incubation at 37 °C gives optimum results for determination of MIC. Taking the maximum drug concentration attainable in blood during therapy, the strains were classified as sensitive and resistant. All strains were resistant to DDS and P. One strain of NB was sensitive to St. One strain each of NA and NB was borderline sensitive to C. Four out of 5 strains in both species were sensitive to S. All strains were sensitive to T. The organisms remained viable in drugs, thus suggesting the limitations of antinocardial therapy.
Penicillin Resistance, Sulfadiazine, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillins, Tetracycline, Nocardia, Culture Media, Agar, Chloramphenicol, Nocardia asteroides, Streptomycin, Dapsone
Penicillin Resistance, Sulfadiazine, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillins, Tetracycline, Nocardia, Culture Media, Agar, Chloramphenicol, Nocardia asteroides, Streptomycin, Dapsone
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
