Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ligation device assisting low anterior anastomosis

Authors: B S, Gingold; M L, Cooper; M K, Wallack;

Ligation device assisting low anterior anastomosis

Abstract

The use of the circular stapler has enabled surgeons to perform very low anterior resections where previously abdominoperineal proctectomy would be performed for carcinoma of the rectum. The use of the roticulator or other linear stapler devices has facilitated these anastomoses and precluded the necessity for pursestring sutures, thereby reducing the incidence of incomplete tissue rings, which should reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks. One significant drawback to the roticulator, especially in the narrow male pelvis, is its application for very low lesions. In many cases the stapler cannot be forced deeply enough into the pelvis to allow for a sufficient margin below the tumor.The purpose of this article is to report results of a prototype that applies a gasket that automatically fixes the rectum to the rod of the circular stapler.To date the device has been used 22 times in 14 patients (8 patients had both limbs attached using the device, whereas 6 patients had only the rectal stump attached in this manner).All anastomoses healed without complication, all patients had complete donuts of tissue, and only two anastomoses had to be reinforced.The use of this device may facilitate stapling of very low anastomoses for carcinoma of the rectum.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Wound Healing, Rectal Neoplasms, Surface Properties, Anastomosis, Surgical, Carcinoma, Suture Techniques, Rectum, Equipment Design, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Surgical Staplers, Humans, Ligation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!