Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio della ricer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Low rectal cancer—What is the choice?

Authors: FEGIZ, Gianfranco; INDINNIMEO, Marileda; GOZZO, Paolo; Del Grande E; Cataldi S; BROZZETTI, Stefania;

Low rectal cancer—What is the choice?

Abstract

In patients operated on for low rectal cancer, the functional results, disease recurrence, and survival have been evaluated with respect to the type of surgery performed. Particular attention was paid to analysis of the pathologic aspects, considered in our opinion, as risk factors for recurrence. The investigation was carried out on 131 patients, of whom 70 received anterior resection, 55 abdominoperineal resection, and 6 local treatment. Abdominoperineal resection was carried out in more advanced disease. Postoperative mortality was 2.1 percent after anterior resection and 0 after abdominoperineal resection or local treatment. Follow-up, carried out in 96 patients (44 anterior resections, 46 abdominoperineal resections, and 6 local treatments), ranged from 12 to 84 (mean, 33.3) months. Recurrence rate was 53.3 percent after abdominoperineal resection and 28.9 percent after anterior resection. Recurrence appears not be related to the treatment performed, but rather depend on certain aspects of the neoplasm such as diameter exceeding 5 cm, extraparietal infiltration, lymphangitis, and tumor indifferentiation. We observed anastomotic recurrence in 28.6 percent of patients with a margin of less than 2 cm. An intensive follow-up scheme enabled us to recognize this type of recurrence early and to reoperate with radical intent. One year after anterior resection functional results were encouraging. No severe incontinence was reported. Local treatment was performed in carefully selected patients (T1, N0) and no cases of mortality or recurrence were observed.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Humans, Low rectal cancer,surgey,anterior resection,Miles, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!