Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ileorectostomy in the older patient

Authors: P S, Beckwith; B G, Wolff; R C, Frazee;

Ileorectostomy in the older patient

Abstract

Surgeons have always been wary of performing abdominal colectomy and ileorectostomy in the older patient for fear of excessive stool frequency and fecal incontinence. Thirty-two patients, aged 60 years or over, underwent abdominal colectomy and ileorectostomy and were closely questioned regarding their preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative bowel habits. These patients were compared with a group of age- and sex-matched controls who had undergone right hemicolectomy. In both groups, the ileocecal valve had been resected, but only the ileorectostomy group had the entire colon resected. Immediately after ileorectostomy, patients underwent an average increase in bowel movements of 3.6 movements per day. This gradually decreased over time, so that, after five years, older patients with ileorectostomy had an average of 1.5 more bowel movements per day than they had had preoperatively. There were similar increases in the right hemicolectomy patient group: 0.9 bowel movements per day immediately after right hemicolectomy and 0.2 bowel movements per day after five years. Incontinence was an uncommon problem in both groups. This study suggests that elderly patients undergoing abdominal colectomy and ileorectostomy have an increase in daily bowel movements, which is not solely attributable to the loss of the right colon. However, it is a procedure that is well tolerated, with a low risk of incontinence and only a mild increase in stool frequency.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ileostomy, Rectum, Middle Aged, Humans, Female, Defecation, Colectomy, Fecal Incontinence, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!