
doi: 10.1007/bf02046087
pmid: 14108436
The “melting point”Tm, the mean molar (guanine+cytosine) composition and the compositional distribution of purified DNA from several strains ofXanthomonas, Chromobacterium and yellow-pigmented marine bacteria have been determined. These groups were selected because they had been analyzed adansonially. Ten strains ofXanthomonas had an average molar (guanine+cytosine) composition within the range 66.0–68.2%, which was very close to that ofPseudomonas (60–68%), as expected. All strains ofChromobacterium (six of theviolaceum biotype and three of thelividum biotype) had mean molar (guanine+cytosine) compositions within the range 63.4–71.4%. The yellow-pigmented marine flavobacteria had mean molar (guanine+cytosine) compositions of 35.6–40.6%. This suggests that they would not be genetically related to the yellow-pigmentedXanthomonas, nor to facultative aerobic organisms, such asAeromonas and theEnterobacteriaceae. The yellow-pigmented marine swarming bacteria, which resembleCytophaga, fell into two separate groups: some had a mean molar (guanine+cytosine) composition of about 34%, others were around 63%. This suggests genetic heterogeneity. The compositional distribution of DNA molecules was on the whole more narrow in polarly flagellated than in peritrichous organisms.
DNA, Bacterial, Base Composition, Cytosine, Guanine, Xanthomonas, Bacteria, Chromobacterium, Pseudomonas, DNA, Cytophaga, Classification, Flavobacterium
DNA, Bacterial, Base Composition, Cytosine, Guanine, Xanthomonas, Bacteria, Chromobacterium, Pseudomonas, DNA, Cytophaga, Classification, Flavobacterium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 90 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
