
doi: 10.1007/bf02032867
pmid: 3204689
Three unrelated patients are described, each with a complex,de novo chromosome rearrangement involving four or more break points. One of the patients had few clinical abnormalities and an apparently balanced karyotype with seven break points (1q32, 2q37, 3q26.2, 5q11.2, 5q15, 6q25, 10p13) in six derivative chromosomes. Another patient had multiple congenital anomalies and an apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving four break points (5q13, 5q35, 8p11, 11p15) in three derivatives. The other patient showed multiple anomalies and an unbalanced CCR with seven break points (4q21, 4q25, 6q15, 6q21, 10p13, 10q22, 10q25) in three derivatives including [del(4) (q21q25)]. Each person's parents had normal karyotypes and showed no spontaneous chromosome instability. The fragile sites induced with the FrdU method in two of the three pairs of parents did not correspond to the break points in the CCRs in their offspring. In the last patient, a QFQ-heteromorphism study revealed that del(4) is of paternal origin. The cause of the CCRs in the three patients is unknown. None of their parents had a history of exposure to teratogenic agents or of radiation of the gonads. None of the parents was an atomic bomb victim although four of them lived in Nagasaki.
Chromosome Aberrations, Male, Chromosome Fragility, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Translocation, Genetic, Child, Preschool, Humans, Abnormalities, Multiple, Female, Chromosome Deletion
Chromosome Aberrations, Male, Chromosome Fragility, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Translocation, Genetic, Child, Preschool, Humans, Abnormalities, Multiple, Female, Chromosome Deletion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
