
doi: 10.1007/bf01986539
pmid: 4580184
Both in vivo and in vitro methodologies have uses as cytogenetic test systems for mutagenicity testing. The in vivo methods are certainly the choice as the primary test system, except perhaps in the case of viruses and some biologicals. When an in vitro method is used anaphase offers some advantages as greater speed and ease of observation, the detection of defects produced in G2 and mitosis, and the ability to distinguish between gaps and breaks, while it sacrifices the morphologic detail and ability to localize defects to specific chromosomes found in metaphase.
Chromosome Aberrations, Cytological Techniques, Mitosis, Chromosome Disorders, Chromosomes, Karyotyping, Methods, Animals, Humans, Mutagens
Chromosome Aberrations, Cytological Techniques, Mitosis, Chromosome Disorders, Chromosomes, Karyotyping, Methods, Animals, Humans, Mutagens
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
