
Changes in menstrual cycle length, menstrual duration, number of pads, dysmenorrhea and non-cyclic pelvic pain were studied in 43 women following tubal sterilization with three different techniques. One group consisted of 17 women undergoing laparotomy by Pomeroy technique; the second group consisted of 11 women undergoing laparoscopy by Fallope rings; and the third group consisted of 15 women undergoing colpotomy by fimbriectomy. The differences before and after sterilization in cycle length were non-significant in all groups (p > 0.05). After sterilization, menstrual duration and number of pads were significantly increased in the laparotomy (p 0.05). Comparison of these parameters between the groups did not show any significant differences (p > 0.05). After sterilization, increases in the severity of dysmenorrhea and non-cyclic pelvic pain were non-significant in all groups (p > 0.05). We concluded that there were no significant differences in menstrual disorders after sterilization among these three different techniques.
Adult, Parity, [No Keyword], Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, Humans, Female, Pelvic Pain, Menstruation Disturbances
Adult, Parity, [No Keyword], Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, Humans, Female, Pelvic Pain, Menstruation Disturbances
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
