
doi: 10.1007/bf01964449
pmid: 2060516
Sparfloxacin disk susceptibility test criteria for the NCCLS and ICS/DIN methods were determined by testing 400 bacterial wild-type isolates. Disks containing 5 micrograms of the drug could be used satisfactorily in both procedures. The following interpretive zone size breakpoints for the NCCLS and ICS/DIN methods were proposed: less than or equal to 18 and 20 mm respectively for resistance (MIC greater than 1 mg/l), and greater than or equal to 23 and 25 mm respectively for susceptibility (MIC less than or equal to 0.5 mg/l). These criteria were based on preliminary maximum serum concentrations of approximately 1.5 mg/l after a single oral dose of 400 mg of the drug. Regression equations for both methods correlating MICs and zone sizes based on test results for 361 organisms are presented. The equations allow calculation of breakpoints for higher or lower serum peak levels. Sparfloxacin was two to four times more active than ciprofloxacin against gram-positive cocci, and showed equal activity against gram-negative rods. Zone diameter quality control values for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were 26-30 mm (NCCLS) and 30-33 mm (ICS/DIN), and for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 27-28 mm (NCCLS) and 29-31 mm (ICS/DIN).
Anti-Infective Agents, Ciprofloxacin, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Regression Analysis, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Fluoroquinolones
Anti-Infective Agents, Ciprofloxacin, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Regression Analysis, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Fluoroquinolones
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
