
doi: 10.1007/bf01888584
pmid: 1426852
This retrospective investigation assessed the sensitivity of colonoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps seen previously at barium enema examination. Included in the study were 77 patients with 106 polypoid lesions. Films showing lesions not subsequently seen at colonoscopy were reviewed and only those lesions with a visible point of attachment, exhibiting no movement in response to filling or change in position of the patient, and confidently diagnosed as a polyp by both reviewing radiologists were included among the 106 lesions. Sixteen lesions (15%) seen radiologically were not located colonoscopically, indicating an endoscopic sensitivity of 85%. Contrary to previous reports, most of the lesions missed endoscopically were in the left colon in regions thought to have been traversed by the instrument. The 15% false-negative rate found for colonoscopy is consistent with existing reports on colonoscopic errors and is approximately the same as the false-negative error rate for radiologic detection of colonic polyps.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Rectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps, Enema, Colonoscopy, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Humans, Barium Sulfate, False Negative Reactions, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Rectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps, Enema, Colonoscopy, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Humans, Barium Sulfate, False Negative Reactions, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
