
doi: 10.1007/bf01869997
pmid: 4205084
Urea transport across amphibian membranes is influenced by interactions with the membrane, the solvent and other solutes. One case of solute interaction, that in which the two species are chemically identical, is investigated here. Because of the effects of hypertonic urea on permeability, the demonstration of interaction required consideration of the ratior of bidirectional tracer permeabilities. Mucosal-to-serosal (M→S) and serosal-to-mucosal (M←S) tracer urea fluxes were determined in paired toad urinary bladders, in the absence and presence of abundant urea. In the control state,r was 1.0. Addition of 0.3m urea toM increasedr, and toS decreasedr. These results indicate coupling of abundant and tracer urea flows (isotope interaction), probably occurring in specialized regions. The effects persisted after the addition of antidiuretic hormone, despite the opposing influence of osmotic water flow. Quantitatively different effects of mucosal and serosal hypertonicity, both with and without antidiuretic hormone, are explicable in terms of heterogeneous parallel and series permeability barriers.
Analysis of Variance, Osmosis, Vasopressins, Cell Membrane, Osmolar Concentration, Urinary Bladder, Electric Conductivity, Water, Biological Transport, Models, Biological, Permeability, Membrane Potentials, Animals, Bufo marinus, Urea, Mathematics
Analysis of Variance, Osmosis, Vasopressins, Cell Membrane, Osmolar Concentration, Urinary Bladder, Electric Conductivity, Water, Biological Transport, Models, Biological, Permeability, Membrane Potentials, Animals, Bufo marinus, Urea, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
