
doi: 10.1007/bf01762230
We consider methods by which a precedence matrix may be modified without severely degrading the error-detecting capability of a parser utilizing the matrix. Two different definitions of “the same” error detection capability are considered. The first, called “exact equivalence”, permits only useless parts of the precedence matrix to be modified. The second, called simply “equivalence”, allows the modified matrix to perform some reductions, but never to shift an input symbol, after the original has detected an error. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for a modified precedence parser to be equivalent or exactly equivalent to the canonical parser. We then consider the interesting case where the modification is caused by replacing the precedence matrix by linear precedence functions. A simple algorithm to find (if they exist) exactly equivalent linear precedence functions for a given precedence matrix is presented.
General topics in the theory of software
General topics in the theory of software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
