Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Neurochemical Resear...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Neurochemical Research
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Affinities of muscarinic drugs for [3H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS) and [3H]oxotremorine (OXO) binding to a mixture of M1−M4 muscarinic receptors: Use of NMS/OXO-M ratios to group compounds into potential agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist classes

Authors: N A, Sharif; G W, Williams; L M, DeSantis;

Affinities of muscarinic drugs for [3H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS) and [3H]oxotremorine (OXO) binding to a mixture of M1−M4 muscarinic receptors: Use of NMS/OXO-M ratios to group compounds into potential agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist classes

Abstract

The relative affinities of various muscarinic drugs in the antagonist ([3H]N-methyl scopolamine ([3H]NMS)) and agonist ([3H]Oxotremorine-m ([3H]OXO-M)) binding assays using a mixture of tissues containing M1-M4 receptor subtypes have been determined. [3H]NMS bound with high affinity (Kd = 25 +/- 5.9 pM; n = 3) and to a high density Bmax = 11.8 +/- 0.025 nmol/g wet weight) of muscarinic receptors. [3H]OXO-M appeared to bind to two binding sites with differing affinities (Kd1 = 2.5 +/- 0.1 nM; Kd2 = 9.0 +/- 4.9 microM; n = 4) and to a different population of binding sites (Bmax1 = 5.0 +/- 0.26 nmol/g wet weight; Bmax2 = 130 +/- 60 nmol/g wet weight). Well known antagonists exhibited high affinity for [3H]NMS binding but a lower affinity for [3H]OXO-M binding. The opposite was true for acetylcholine and other known agonists. However, pilocarpine and McN-A-343 had similar affinities for sites labeled by both radioligands. Using the ratios of antagonist-to-agonist binding affinities, it was possible to group compounds into apparently distinct full agonist (ratios of 180-665; e.g. carbachol, muscarine, OXO-M, OXO-S and arecoline), partial agonist (ratios of 14-132; e.g. McN-A-343, pilocarpine, aceclidine, bethanechol, OXA-22 and acetylcholine) and antagonist (ratios of 0.22-1.9; e.g. atropine, NMS, pirenzepine, methoctramine, 4-DAMP and p-fluorohexahydrosialo-difenidol) classes. These data suggest that the NMS/OXO-M affinity ratios using a mixture of M1-M4 muscarinic receptors may be a useful way to screen and group a large number of compounds into apparent agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist classes of cholinergic agents.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Myocardium, Oxotremorine, Cholinergic Agents, Scopolamine Derivatives, Brain, Muscarinic Antagonists, Muscarinic Agonists, N-Methylscopolamine, Tritium, Binding, Competitive, Receptors, Muscarinic, Rats, Kinetics, Radioligand Assay, Animals, Rabbits, Lung

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!