<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1007/bf01677391
pmid: 7372357
The fluid management of 50 children with Haemohpilus influenzae type B meningitis was reviewed. Clinical hydration status on admission, serum sodium values, and overall fluid balance was assessed to determine the contribution of empiric fluid restriction in preventing the development of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Thirty-three of 50 patients were well hydrated on admission. Sixteen of 50 patients (32%) initially had signs of dehydration and five out of 16 were in shock. Only two patients had evidence of SIADH. Twenty patients were empirically fluid restricted, including one who proceeded to develop SIADH; thirteen were not fluid restricted, and sixteen who were dehydrated received replacement fluids in addition to the usual maintenance fluids. None of these patients developed SIADH. As fluid depletion was more common than excessive fluid retention in our patients, empiric fluid restrictions could not be justified. Careful, individualized monitoring of the clinical state of hydration, electrolytes and osmolaities is suggested to guide the fluid management in these patients.
Dehydration, Sodium, Infant, Newborn, Water-Electrolyte Imbalance, Infant, Inappropriate ADH Syndrome, Child, Preschool, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Hyponatremia
Dehydration, Sodium, Infant, Newborn, Water-Electrolyte Imbalance, Infant, Inappropriate ADH Syndrome, Child, Preschool, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Hyponatremia
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |