
doi: 10.1007/bf01661168
As a result of our experience, the SR distributed programming language has evolved. One change is that resources and processes are now dynamic rather than static. Another change is that operations and processes are now integrated in a novel way: all the mechanisms for process interaction — remote and local procedure call, rendezvous, dynamic process creation, and asynchronous message passing — are expressed in similar ways. This paper explains the rationale for these and other changes. We examine the fundamental issues faced by the designers of any distributed programming language and consider the ways in which these issues could be addressed. Special attention is given to the design objectives of expressiveness, simplicity, and efficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
