
doi: 10.1007/bf01659077
pmid: 8109104
AbstractBoth computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide important information not obtainable by chest radiography regarding staging of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. However, while CT and MRI can both detect enlarged mediastinal nodes, this only approximately indicates tumor involvement. For example, enlarged nodes do not necessarily contain tumor, so biopsy is necessary before declaring the patient inoperable. As well, normal‐sized nodes may contain tumor, and whether mediastinoscopy is required in such situations is controversial. Similarly, neither MRI nor CT is highly accurate in detecting mediastinal or chest‐wall involvement, although certain specific features can occasionally be highly predictive of invasion.
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic, Lung Neoplasms, Biopsy, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Staging
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic, Lung Neoplasms, Biopsy, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
