Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao World Journal of Sur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
World Journal of Surgery
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

High gastric ulcer

Authors: H E, Jensen; J, Hoffmann; P, Wille-Jørgensen;

High gastric ulcer

Abstract

AbstractFifty‐six patients with high gastric ulcers were studied retrospectively. There were 38 women and 18 men. The mean age was 66 years. Findings were: 25% had ulcer histories of more than 5 years; 45% had illnesses in other systems making them poor operative risks; 34% were taking ulcerogenic drugs, and 36% were on antiulcer treatment prior to surgery; 43% presented with severe bleeding, 16% with perforation, and 2 patients had simultaneous bleeding and perforation; 38% had deeply penetrating ulcers and many ulcers were very large; 7 patients had ulcers in hiatus hernias. Sixty‐three percent of the procedures were emergencies. Half of the operations were nonresective, with or without vagotomy. The other half were gastric resections of various types. The overall mortality rate was 18%, but the mortality rate was 24% for emergency procedures and 9% for elective ones. The highest mortality rate, 45%, occurred after emergency resective procedures. Vagotomy did not increase postoperative mortality when added to a nonresective procedure. Beside the 10 patients who died, 6 others developed severe postoperative complications, usually respiratory failure or suture line leakage. Follow‐up of between 6 months and 12 years (average 3 years) was possible in 55% of the patients. Two developed recurrent ulcers and 2 had overlooked gastric carcinomas. An approach of management for high gastric ulcer is outlined recommending a Pauchet operation for good‐risk patients, and vagotomy and drainage for old and frail patients. Medical treatment should be pursued as long as possible to avoid an often hazardous operation.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Middle Aged, Vagotomy, Gastrectomy, Peptic Ulcer Perforation, Humans, Female, Stomach Ulcer, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!