
doi: 10.1007/bf01657985
pmid: 7293193
AbstractThe surgeon should take pains to section and study himself the operative specimen after excision for acute pancreatitis, in order to understand the true nature of the lesions, which the most attentive and competent pathological examination cannot describe as vividly as direct examination by the operator. Often he will be surprised to find that the lesions, predominant in the capsule, are less profound and less severe than he had thought at first sight. The necrosis, which is sometimes limited to the peripheral and interstitial tissue, sparing the gland itself (its prognosis is less serious and has led many surgeons to perform surgical excision). However the problems encountered postoperatively have given rise to doubts a posteriori as to whether this is legitimate. Reference is made to the decapsulation of the pancreas described by Romanian authors, and a method for future operative diagnosis of glandular necrosis is proposed.
Necrosis, Pancreatitis, Acute Disease, Humans, Prognosis
Necrosis, Pancreatitis, Acute Disease, Humans, Prognosis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
