
doi: 10.1007/bf01656376
pmid: 7046265
AbstractResults in the first 100 orthotopic liver allografts performed in the Cambridge‐King's College Hospital series (1968–1980) are reported. Twenty‐two patients survived beyond a year (age range, 16–59 years). Of these, 12 were cirrhotics and 10 were primary malignancies. Of the cirrhotics, 10 are alive, with the 2 deaths resulting from cholangitis. Two patients who had primary hepatic carcinoma are alive at 1 and 5 years following transplantation; the 8 deaths in this group were attributed to tumor recurrence (5 patients), sepsis (2 patients), and secondary cirrhosis possibly due to non‐A non‐B hepatitis (1 patient). Patients who survive for 6 months have a greatly increased chance of surviving the second 6 months and subsequently. Of the last 14 liver allografts (12 for cirrhosis and 2 for primary malignancy), there are 9 survivors. This mortality (36%) probably represents the results of better selection of the cirrhotics before they were too sick to withstand the operation; better control of rejection; and refinements in surgical procedure and anesthesia. For those patients surviving the first year, there is a 40% chance of the tumor's being eliminated. The late tumor recurrence rate is unacceptably high at 60%, however, and our criteria for patient selection have become increasingly selective.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Liver Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Liver Transplantation, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Liver Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Liver Transplantation, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
