Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Osteoporosis Interna...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Osteoporosis International
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Bone densitometry: Current assessment

Authors: H K, Genant; K G, Faulkner; C C, Glüer; K, Engelke;

Bone densitometry: Current assessment

Abstract

Noninvasive measurements of bone mineral density allow the assessment of skeletal integrity, both centrally and peripherally, with high precision and accuracy and with relatively low radiation dose. When estimating skeletal status, it may be important to measure bone mineral density at more than one site to assess differential skeletal responses related to disease or therapy and to assess differential fracture risk. Due to technical differences between the various methods of bone mineral measurement, the quantitative results are typically expressed with differing calibration standards, such that direct comparisons must be carefully made. SPA measurements have been shown in several prospective studies to aid in the assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk. Limited data to date have shown spinal DPA to be at least comparable to peripheral SPA for fracture risk assessment, and current research with DXA indicates promising results for the X-ray-based bone densitometers. DXA has seen rapid growth in recent years, with current scanners able to measure the spine, hip, forearm and total body bone mineral density with a speed and precision previously unattainable with the isotope-based DPA systems. Longitudinal studies have shown QCT to be highly sensitive for detecting early and rapid bone loss and cross-sectional studies have shown QCT's capacity for separating normal and osteoporotic patient populations. though prospective studies are needed to confirm the latter result. QCT has the disadvantage of higher cost and radiation dose compared with the other methods currently in use, but it is the only noninvasive modality able preferentially to measure trabecular, cortical, or integral bone density at any skeletal site. All of the techniques in current clinical use, specifically SPA, DPA, DXA and QCT, represent major advances for the noninvasive measurement of bone mineral density at radiation doses significantly less than those due to yearly exposure from normal background radiation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!