Assessment of some aqueous residual chlorine measurements

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Dec 1980 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, volume 24, pages 251-256 (issn: 0007-4861, eissn: 1432-0800,

Copyright policy )

Authors: R, Otson; D T, Williams;

doi: 10.1007/bf01608105

pmid: 7362905

Assessment of some aqueous residual chlorine measurements

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Sodium hypochlorite solutions, filter effluent, plant effluent, and tap water were analyzed by the amperometric titration (AT), residual chlorine electrode, (EL), and DPD ferrous titrimetric (DPD) methods and the results were compared for the range 0.2 to 2.0 ppm residual chlorine. Overall precision for measurements by all three methods and in three laboratories was ≤10% RSD for TARC and ≤20% for FARC. Amperometric titration was judged the method of choice because of precision of measurements, simplicity of operation, and capability for both TARC and FARC determinations.

Related Organizations

Health and Welfare Canada

Keywords

Time Factors, Sewage, Industrial Waste, Water, Fresh Water, Chlorine

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average