
doi: 10.1007/bf01585749
The generalization is twofold. First, the problem is defined for closed convex cones rather than for the non-negative orthant. Second, some, but not all, the results are stated for infinite-dimensional real Hilbert spaces. Two infinite-dimensional existence results are given. That is, the authors state conditions under which feasibility of a Generalized Linear Complementarity Problem (GLCP) with copositive plus operator implies solvability. Moreover a section is devoted to a finite-dimensional perturbation result. It is immediately apparent that polyhedral cones have a distinctive role. In the infinite-dimensional setting such cones are defined as finitely generated cones, and hence they live in a finite-dimensional subspace. Despite this, the final result, which characterizes polyhedral cones, is finite-dimensional: if the dimension of the space is finite then ``polyhedral cones are the only ones with the property that every copositive plus feasible GLCP is solvable''. The extension to infinite dimension of this result is one of the open problems that conclude the paper. I will stay in tune to learn, in a forthcoming paper by the same authors, how the mystery resolves.
Programming in abstract spaces, Linear programming, Special polytopes (linear programming, centrally symmetric, etc.), finite-dimensional perturbation, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming), closed convex cones, infinite-dimensional real Hilbert spaces, copositive plus operator
Programming in abstract spaces, Linear programming, Special polytopes (linear programming, centrally symmetric, etc.), finite-dimensional perturbation, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming), closed convex cones, infinite-dimensional real Hilbert spaces, copositive plus operator
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
