Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Aesthetic Plastic Su...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Article . 1978 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Current status of liquid injectable silicone

Authors: D, Goulian;

Current status of liquid injectable silicone

Abstract

Since the inception of the recently concluded formal study, liquid injectable silicone has been both used and abused by many. Reports in both lay and professional literature reflect this experience in the form of a wide range of opinions and judgments regarding the use of this material in corrective surgery. Those intimately involved in the former study agree that, used properly, liquid injectable silicone appears to have redeeming value in at least a limited group of problem situations. These investigators further agree that its general use could lead to many problems unless its limited scope of usefulness and proper use are known, accepted, and abided by those using it. To satisfy the lingering doubts raised by the many negative reports, further controlled study is also indicated. Until there is a method of control over the general clinical use of liquid silicone and until persistent questions on its safety and efficacy, over a protracted period of time, are answered, the investigators are convinced that the substance should not be made generally available. Designed before the complexity required of a proper study was appreciated, the original research protocol lacked sufficient detail and was broad and vague in scope. The Dow-Corning Company and its investigators therefore recommended the termination of the study and set about planning a new research protocol that would supply more complete information in a much more restricted area of clinical need. This was done with the cooperation of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons and was submitted for approval by the FDA along with an expanded group of clinical investigators selected with the help of the ASPRS, with consideration given to their even geographic distribution. This new research study was submitted to the FDA and approved. Accordingly, on March 1, 1978, a much more vigorous, detailed, and restrictive study, confined to major tissue defects of the head and neck, was resumed by a larger group of investigators representing the ASPRS supervised by a medical monitor acceptable to all. Hopefully, this study, which will occupy a period of 7 years and a limited number of patients, plus the rigorous efforts to trace and document those involved in the earlier study and the tracking down and full documentation of all known complications, will ultimately bring the true status of liquid injectable silicone into proper and generally acceptable perspective.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!