<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1007/bf01574314
pmid: 4855315
American psychiatry has tended to divide into two camps—one seeking to understand persons as bodies, and the other seeking to understand them in terms of a mechanistic mental life. Both these approaches, while rewarding in certain respects, fail in the quest of understanding persons as persons. Since psychiatry is rooted in this type of understanding, it is unfortunate that the division within its ranks should be along lines which confuse the major issue of psychiatry and obstruct the development of a systematic understanding of persons which is the major task of psychiatry.
Physician-Patient Relations, Psychoanalytic Theory, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychoanalytic Therapy
Physician-Patient Relations, Psychoanalytic Theory, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychoanalytic Therapy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |