
doi: 10.1007/bf01570695
pmid: 1414657
This article is a report on long-term followup of a total of 44 serious gynecomastia cases in the stages I-III (according to Deutinger). The treatment consisted of either a semicircular incision and subcutaneous mastectomy or a superiorly or an inferiorly based nipple transposition while performing male reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetically pleasing results could be obtained by a periareolar approach and mastectomy. This inconspicuous procedure is feasible even in massive gynecomastia cases (stage III) or in cases of male breast asymmetry. On the other hand, all cases with breast reduction plasty and nipple transposition resulted in wing-shaped, mainly broad scars, and subjectively unfavorable results. Consequently, we favor the semicircular approach in male reduction mammoplasty in treating serious gynecomastias. With regard to possible male breast cancer etiology, the histological specimen of the mammary gland in gynecomastia is excised prior to any additional liposuction for supplementary body contouring.
Male, Mammaplasty, Gynecomastia, Humans, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Mammaplasty, Gynecomastia, Humans, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
