
doi: 10.1007/bf01556526
pmid: 726481
AbstractOperations that reestablish flow to proximally obstructed coronary arteries are being applied with greater frequency and greater success. The long‐term effects of such operations will ultimately be measured by increased longevity for patients with coronary artery disease, providing that perioperative injury is held to an absolute minimum and technical expertise is maintained at an absolute maximum. Application of myocardial protective techniques requires a knowledge of coronary and myocardial physiology. The use of nonrandomized applications of new protective techniques is strongly discouraged since such adventures provide little insight for the future. Further elucidation of the safe intervals for brief periods of ischemia in hearts with and without obstructed coronary arteries is needed, as are more refined measurements of physiologic and biochemical effects of revascularization techniques in regions of myocardium supplied by heterogeneously affected coronary arteries.
Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Myocardial Revascularization, Humans, Coronary Disease, Heart, Constriction
Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Myocardial Revascularization, Humans, Coronary Disease, Heart, Constriction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
