Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic
Copyright policy )Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic
The author relates the deontic theory of simple categorical oughts of \textit{B. van Fraasen} [J. Philos. 70, 5-19 (1973)] with the default logic of \textit{R. Reiter} [Artif. Intell. 13, 81-132 (1980; Zbl 0435.68069)]. Furthermore, he discusses the extension of this correspondence to conditional obligations and points out that there are deeper analogies between deontic and default logic.
- University of Maryland, College Park United States
deontic logic, conditional obligations, Logic in artificial intelligence, nonmonotonic logic, Other nonclassical logic, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations, deontic theory of simple categorical oughts, default logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms)
deontic logic, conditional obligations, Logic in artificial intelligence, nonmonotonic logic, Other nonclassical logic, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations, deontic theory of simple categorical oughts, default logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms)
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).33 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!