
doi: 10.1007/bf01407901
Mackworth and Freuder have analyzed the time complexity of several constraint satisfaction algorithms.(1) Mohr and Henderson have given new algorithms, AC-4 and PC-3, for arc and path consistency, respectively, and have shown that the arc consistency algorithm is optimal in time complexity and of the same order space complexity as the earlier algorithms.(2) In this paper, we give parallel algorithms for solving node and arc consistency. We show that any parallel algorithm for enforcing are consistency in the worst case must have O(na) sequential steps, wheren is number of nodes, anda is the number of labels per node. We give several parallel algorithms to do arc consistency. It is also shown that they all have optimal time complexity. The results of running the parallel algorithms on a BBN Butterfly multiprocessor are also presented.
consistent labeling, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, Pattern recognition, speech recognition, node consistency, computer vision algorithms, arc consistency, Theory of operating systems, constraint satisfaction algorithm, Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science, Butterfly mircoprocessor, parallel complexity, inherent parallelism
consistent labeling, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, Pattern recognition, speech recognition, node consistency, computer vision algorithms, arc consistency, Theory of operating systems, constraint satisfaction algorithm, Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science, Butterfly mircoprocessor, parallel complexity, inherent parallelism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
