
doi: 10.1007/bf01383874
VHDL-based verification methods require a formalized semantics of this hardware description language. As it has been shown recently that flowgraphs are an excellent means for defining the semantics of VHDL, we also use them to formalize full VHDL. However, our approach differs in important aspects from previous works. We use flowgraphs as an intermediate level for facilitating the deep embedding of VHDL in higher order logics, i.e. each VHDL program directly is a well-formed formula of the logic itself. This leads to a transparent semantic definition, since all constructs are defined explicitly as conservative extensions of the logic, and allows the direct reasoning about VHDL constructs. The relevant constructs of VHDL have been formalized, including delta delay. As we provide a general verification framework, different verification techniques such as model-checking, first-order theorem proving or invariant-based approaches may be used, depending on the verification task.
ddc:004, DATA processing & computer science, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/004, 004
ddc:004, DATA processing & computer science, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/004, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
