
doi: 10.1007/bf01378595
An investigation based on I-Beam models was undertaken in this paper for extending knowledge regarding the flexural modulus of structural foam. The applicability of five I-Beams models (I-Beam A, B, C, D and E) including a newly developed one (I-Beam E) were investigated in this work. The square law model was used to predict Young's modulus of uniform density foam, which was subsequently utilized for the calculation of the I-Beam models. I-Beam A, B and E were observed from the configuration analysls of each I-Beam to be the more suitable models for predicting the flexural modulus of the structural foams having either an integral skin or a skin with limited residual bubbles, among which I-Beam E is considered to be better than I-Beam B and A. The comparison of the experimental and theoretical values of the flexural modulus of the structural foams molded with gas counter pressure structural foam (CPSF) and low pressure structural foam (LPSF) molding methods also confirmed that the newly developed I-Beam E is the most adequate model for predicting the flexural modulus of structural foams having either an integral skin or a skin with few residual bubbles. I-Beam B and A were also demonstrated to be in good agreement with the experimental data.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
