
doi: 10.1007/bf01318076
pmid: 6293413
A method is described for the serotyping and subgrouping of rotaviruses by enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA). For the isolates tested "blind" under code in parallel the serotyping results obtained by ELISA and serum neutralization of fluorescent focus formation were the same. After absorption of the typing antisera with purified heterotypic rotavirus, up to 128-fold differences in titres between isolates were observed in the ELISA test. The results of serotyping and subgrouping, by ELISA, of strains previously described and characterized by the authors' and other laboratories are also given. An attempt is made to correlate the serological findings with variations between virus strains based upon patterns of genome molecular weights as revealed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The application of this ELISA technique to epidemiological studies and vaccine research is discussed.
Rotavirus, Sheep, Swine, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Molecular Weight, Neutralization Tests, Animals, Humans, RNA, Viral, Cattle, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Serotyping
Rotavirus, Sheep, Swine, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Molecular Weight, Neutralization Tests, Animals, Humans, RNA, Viral, Cattle, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Serotyping
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
