Antigenic relationship of the feline infectious peritonitis virus to coronaviruses of other species

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 1978 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Archives of Virology, volume 58, pages 45-53 (issn: 0304-8608, eissn: 1432-8798,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Pedersen, N. C.; Ward, J.; Mengeling, W. L.;

doi: 10.1007/bf01315534

pmid: 81044

pmc: PMC7087319

Antigenic relationship of the feline infectious peritonitis virus to coronaviruses of other species

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Utilizing the direct and indirect fluorescent antibody procedure, the antigenic relationship of the feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) to 7 other human and animal coronaviruses was studied. FIPV was found to be closely related to transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) of swine. Transmissible gastroenteritis virus and FIPV were in turn antigenically related to human coronavirus 229E (HCV-229E) and canine coronavirus (CCV). An interesting finding in the study was that the 8 coronaviruses selected for this study fell into one of two antigenically distinct groups. Viruses in each group were antigenically related to each other to varying degrees, but were antigenically unrelated to coronaviruses of the second group. The first antigenically related group was comprised of mouse hepatitis virus, type 3 (MHV-3), hemeagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus 67N (HEV-67N) of swine, calf diarrhea coronavirus (CDCV), and human coronavirus 0C43 (HCV-OC43). The second antigenically related group was comprised of FIPV, TGEV, HCV-229E and CCV.

Related Organizations

National Institutes of Health
United States
National Animal Disease Center
United States
University of California, Davis
United States

Keywords

Murine hepatitis virus, Coronaviridae, Transmissible gastroenteritis virus, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Original Papers, Parvoviridae, Epitopes, Feline Panleukopenia Virus, Antigens, Viral

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	174
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%