
doi: 10.1007/bf01203551
pmid: 7813379
Using the routine techniques employed at our two centers for recording pattern electroretinograms and a variety of methods, we investigated the reliability of the gold foil electrode over repeated uses. We found no significant difference between the pattern electroretinograms recorded with new electrodes and those that had had such extensive use in patients that they were believed unsuitable for further clinical use. We therefore continue to recommend the gold foil electrode for repeated use.
Pattern Recognition, Visual, Electroretinography, Equipment Reuse, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Gold, Electrodes
Pattern Recognition, Visual, Electroretinography, Equipment Reuse, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Gold, Electrodes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
