
doi: 10.1007/bf01187138
Transmission electron microscope data on the morphology of exsolution lamellae, the nature of the potassium feldspar and the development of dislocations at lamellar interfaces in coherent cryptoperthites and fine microperthites are reviewed. Dislocations have been reported previously in only two crystals, and periodic dislocations noted in only one, an Or-rich microperthite. Periodic dislocations (spacing 100–150 nm) are here described from a ternary mesoperthite (Or26 Ab52 An22). Small crystallites (<30 nm) of other phases have sometimes nucleated on the dislocations. The 020 lattice fringes of the feldspar phases have been imaged; the difference in 020 spacings can be almost entirely accommodated by the regular dislocations, so that the boundaries may be termed nearlyperfectly semicoherent. Dislocations have been found so far only in cryptoperthites with lens-shaped or straight lamellae, either in Or-rich feldspars or in Ab-rich ternary ones. In intermediate compositions with wavy or zig-zag albite lamellae, or lozengeshaped albite areas (braid microperthites) dislocations have not been observed. Strain reduction in intermediate compositions occurs by migration of lamellar interfaces from (¯601) to near (¯6¯61) as microcline forms in the diagonal association. In Ab-rich ternary feldspars the relatively high Ancontent blocks interface migration, and strain reduction occurs by nucleation of dislocations; the Or-rich feldspar phase is ‘tweed’ orthoclase. In Or-rich bulk compositions the low volume of albite exerts insufficient stress to promote microcline formation, and tweed orthoclase develops. Interfaces do not migrate, and dislocations again develop. Fields in which different potassium feldspar polymorphs occur and in which the different exsolution textures are developed are summarized on a ternary diagram.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
