
doi: 10.1007/bf01115243
pmid: 11651927
This essay examines the claim that physicians have a special obligation to engage in social and political activism. Four ethical paradigms are considered. Two paradigms, the preventive medicine and the social medicine models, embody a limited professional obligation to advocate the priority of health in society; the justification for a more aggressive stance is limited by the failings of paternalism. The radical model and the heroic model speak to issues of personal virtue rather than professional obligation; they are not strictly comparable.
Moral Obligations, Social Responsibility, Human Rights, Social Values, Politics, Social Justice, Physicians, Virtues, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Ethics, Medical, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Physician's Role, Conscience, Nuclear Warfare
Moral Obligations, Social Responsibility, Human Rights, Social Values, Politics, Social Justice, Physicians, Virtues, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Ethics, Medical, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Physician's Role, Conscience, Nuclear Warfare
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
