
doi: 10.1007/bf01079364
pmid: 11659679
The House of Lords recently set up a Select Committee on Medical Ethics to consider euthanasia and related medical decisions at the end of life. This followed widespread publicity surrounding recent cases, particular the trial and conviction of a doctor for the attempted murder of a consenting terminally ill patient, and the House of Lords' ruling that it is not unlawful to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from a patient in a “persistent vegetative state”. This paper suggests a perspective on some of the moral issues and conflicts which the House of Lords will no doubt consider. A legal structure in which medical euthanasia could be both permitted and controlled is then proposed involving two complementary mechanisms, a formal Euthanasia Notification procedure and a system of Euthanasia Tribunals.
Ethics, Freedom, Jurisprudence, Euthanasia, Interprofessional Relations, Advisory Committees, Decision Making, Double Effect Principle, Community Participation, Legislation as Topic, Intention, Euthanasia, Passive, Lawyers, Euthanasia, Active, Humans, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Family, Interdisciplinary Communication, Mental Competency, Advance Directives
Ethics, Freedom, Jurisprudence, Euthanasia, Interprofessional Relations, Advisory Committees, Decision Making, Double Effect Principle, Community Participation, Legislation as Topic, Intention, Euthanasia, Passive, Lawyers, Euthanasia, Active, Humans, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Family, Interdisciplinary Communication, Mental Competency, Advance Directives
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
