
doi: 10.1007/bf01065575
pmid: 605197
The present article discusses the importance of evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of key institutional personnel prior to attempting program innovations. The importance of such individuals in "making" or "breaking" effective programs is emphasized, and various key hospital staff members are described. A simple evaluation process is discussed with the purpose of better anticipating problem areas in program development. It was concluded that in some cases, project implementations should not be attempted when assessed personnel problems appear capable of seriously limiting the effectiveness of a program.
Hospitals, Psychiatric, Financing, Government, Attitude of Health Personnel, Interprofessional Relations, Psychiatric Aides, Administrative Personnel, Hospital Administrators, Patient Care Planning, Research Personnel, Nursing, Supervisory, Humans
Hospitals, Psychiatric, Financing, Government, Attitude of Health Personnel, Interprofessional Relations, Psychiatric Aides, Administrative Personnel, Hospital Administrators, Patient Care Planning, Research Personnel, Nursing, Supervisory, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
