
doi: 10.1007/bf01055003
pmid: 6830311
Exposure of workers applying paraquat to fields of tomatoes and citrus, and diquat to waterways containing water hyacinths and hydrilla, was monitored with dermal α-cellulose pads attached at each of ten body locations and with personal air monitors. Estimated total body exposure for tomato applicators was apparently influenced by tractor type. Exposure levels from highest to lowest were: open tractor > enclosed cab tractor ⩾ high-clearance tractor. Citrus applicators' exposure to paraquat averaged 28.5 mg/hr and 12.2 mg/hr, with tank concentrations of 0.11% and 0.07%, respectively. Diquat applicators received minimal exposure. Respiratory exposure was <0.1% of the total body exposure in all experiments. Urine samples collected periodically for all workers were, with one exception, without detectable pesticide contamination. Use of disposable coveralls and regularly washed impermeable gloves should effectively reduce exposure.
Paraquat, Diquat, Humans, Agriculture, Pyridinium Compounds, Environmental Exposure
Paraquat, Diquat, Humans, Agriculture, Pyridinium Compounds, Environmental Exposure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
