
doi: 10.1007/bf01020114
A number of methods exists to fail rock in tension. In general the experimental results obtained by these methods differ, and it is not known how to quantitavely compare them other than by empiricism, even to obtain a value for tensile strength. Thus at present, these simple and very useful tests which measures strength indirectly have their values considered only as an index of strength. In this note a new approach is given which could enable a comparison of these results to be made and so enhance the usefulnes of these tests : it is based on the force at failure and the initial geometrical area of failure rather than upon the ratio of force and area, i.e. stress. For this purpose, published data on sandstones, marble and granite are used.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
