
This paper critically reviews the extensive literature on retrospective voting in response to economic conditions. Each of the major types of analyses which have been performed—time series analyses of national vote totals, presidential popularity, and cross-sectional analyses of individual survey responses—have raised several interesting and important questions. The answers which have been obtained, however, are only partial and limited, as each of these approaches entails serious problems of estimation and interpretation. Further progress in this area, we argue, requires explicit treatment of conceptual and statistical issues which have hindered previous research: the dynamic formulation of expectations and preferences, the incidence of policy (and nonpolicy) effects across the population, notions of incumbering and political responsibility.
Though we alone bear responsibility for the contents of this paper, we have benefitted from conversations over the past few years on this topic with Morris Fiorina, Douglas Hibbs, Donald Kinder, and Gerald Kramer. The National Science Foundation provided research support under grant SES-8309994. Published as Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Douglas Rivers. "A retrospective on retrospective voting." Political behavior 6.4 (1984): 369-393.
Submitted - sswp528.pdf
Time series, 330, Presidential elections, Political Science, Political Psychology, Incumbents, 320, Real income, Political candidates, Economic conditions, Sociology, Voting, Incumbents, Real income, Economic conditions, Time series, Political parties, Political science, Income estimates, Presidential elections, Political candidates, Political parties, Income estimates, Voting, Political science
Time series, 330, Presidential elections, Political Science, Political Psychology, Incumbents, 320, Real income, Political candidates, Economic conditions, Sociology, Voting, Incumbents, Real income, Economic conditions, Time series, Political parties, Political science, Income estimates, Presidential elections, Political candidates, Political parties, Income estimates, Voting, Political science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 103 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
