
doi: 10.1007/bf00975989
1. The table of initial discharge coefficients of diaphragms should be corrected by taking the coefficient value 0.646 (instead of 0.645) for the 0.35 modulus. 2. The functional dependence of the initial discharge coefficient on the modulus of flow-contraction devices, represented by a polynomial of the 4th degree, yields deviations from the accepted values not exceeding 0.13%. 3. In order to compose interpolation tables, it is convenient to approximate the function α=f(m) for diaphragms by three polynomials, and that for nozzles by two polynomials, each corresponding to a certain given interval of moduli. The error in such approximation does not exceed 0.06% for diaphragms, and 0.05% for nozzles. The use of these equations secures uniform results in the interpolation of coefficients.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
