A comparison of natural and professional help
Copyright policy )A comparison of natural and professional help
The study investigated the process and effectiveness of three natural and professional groups who commonly provide help to persons experiencing the important critical life event of marital disruption. Subjects were 42 helpers: 14 mental health professionals, 14 divorce lawyers, and 14 leaders of mutual help groups. Analyses, based on variables derived from coded audiotapes of simulated helping interactions and from ratings of helper effectiveness, indicated many similarities between mental health professionals and mutual help leaders but considerable differences between these two groups and divorce lawyers. Lawyers did more talking overall, showed greater proportions of information giving and closed questions, and were more effective in the legal/financial domain. Additional analyses indicated that all helpers showed fewer information-gathering behaviors and more information- and advice-giving behaviors as the helping interaction progressed.
- University of Illinois System United States
- University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign United States
Counseling, Male, Social Support, Professional-Patient Relations, Social Environment, Community Mental Health Services, Self-Help Groups, Divorce, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Problem Solving
Counseling, Male, Social Support, Professional-Patient Relations, Social Environment, Community Mental Health Services, Self-Help Groups, Divorce, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Problem Solving
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).26 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!